You've been wondering about that Style Identity Calculator! Now's your chance to snap one up.
Buy it today for just ten bucks! Use promo code STYLECALCULATOR. Sale ends 12/12/16. :-)
12 Comments
Dilemma
12/13/2016 04:44:18 pm
I feel like I could look great in some Dramatic-Natural-Gamine but also in some from Ethereal-Natural-Gamine. In both of these two styles I also see clothes that would make me feel rather uncomfortable.
Reply
Rachel
12/15/2016 01:31:09 am
This style identity calculator was so incredibly helpful for me! I found out Im a Romantic Ingenue and it answered so many questions I had about why I looked young but still mature/feminine at the same time! Thank you so much! (It thrills me that Marilyn Monroe is in the same category) but I'm still confused about my season. My coloring is extremely close to Hayley Atwell's and I really can't tell if she's a Deep Winter or an Autumn (like myself)-- what do you think?
Reply
Christina
12/18/2016 07:25:51 am
Sometimes I try to decode celebrities for fun. According to me many of them are being put in wrong categories by "experts". One example: Britney Spears. You always find her in the category of soft natural, but I would say she is a natural ingenue. Possibly a natural-ingenue-gamine. She has yin, but she is kind of girly not sexy in the romantic way. She is also youthful. Another example is Salma Hayek. You always find her in the romantic category, but I am not so pleased with that. She is absolutly romantic, but I wonder if she is a full romantic. Her body is curvy and she has yin features, but her face shape is rather angular. I think there is some yang to her as well. I have wondered if she could be a tr or a soft dramatic but somhow that doesn't fit either. What do you think? Ideas anyone? Rachel?
Reply
Melina
12/18/2016 09:38:14 am
I'm not Rachel, but as far as I know, those "yin" and "yang" things, as well as "soft" are from Kibbe's categories, whose system this site doesn't use ;)
Reply
Rachel
12/18/2016 06:06:01 pm
Hi Christina, I'm Rachel but not THE Rachel.
Reply
Christina
12/19/2016 02:18:16 am
Hi, Rachel!
Rachel
12/20/2016 03:00:49 am
I guess I'm going by Rachel's websites definition of Classic where she says their faces are symmetrical but not a lot stands out-- a perfect yet forgettable face. The only largely distinguishing trait I see on Britney Spears are her droopy eyes but those could easily be a natural trait. And there's an overall girlish femininity that definitely suggests Ingenue when I was looking at her with your suggestion in mind! :)
Reply
Christina
12/22/2016 07:22:34 am
Hi Rachel, I love this discussion too! But Salma doesn't at all remind me of Dita von Teese. Using the Kibbe system Dita probably is a TR and using the Rachel system she is probably a Dramatic Ingenue.
Reply
Christina
12/22/2016 09:45:19 am
Rachel, you asked me about Atwells style category and her season. Honestly, she is totally unknown to me! But now I have looked at some pics of her and I will give you my first impressions. Category: I'm thinking Natural-Romantic- Ingenue.
Reply
Melina
12/23/2016 12:23:03 pm
Christina, just to let you know, this site uses a totally different system than that in prettyyourworld (plus that "color breeze" system has *way* too much categories and they're not clear-cut at all, very confusing!)
Reply
Anna
12/23/2016 01:14:45 pm
Melina, I quote Rachel: "Lora Alexander’s site, Pretty Your World, is incredibly fun and informative. While you’re at it, check out her wonderful blog.": http://www.truth-is-beauty.com/references.html
Li
12/28/2016 05:01:13 pm
I'm wondering how much importance to place on colour in the calculator. If I treat it as more important, I get Dramatic-Romantic-Ingenue, if I treat it as less important, I get Romantic-Ethereal-Ingenue! I'm a True Winter.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
About Me...I'm passionate about helping people become their most authentic and beautiful selves. Categories
All
|