I don't know whether many film & t.v. costume designers have studied personal color analysis. But they apply the principles when they make costuming decisions for characters. Characters are presented in their proper colors to make them seem strong, sincere, or likable. Characters are shown in the wrong colors to make them appear weak, uncertain, uncomfortable, or phony. One of my guilty pleasures of the last year was Spartacus: Blood and Sand on Starz. Lucy Lawless's character, the crafty Lucretia, was almost always shown in completely wrong colors to emphasize her phoniness. Here's Lucy Lawless in good colors (as virtuous Xena, Warrior Princess): ...and Lawless as the scheming, unhappy Lucretia in Spartacus: If you've watched Spartacus (and I really think you should!), you may be thinking "But her husband, Batiatus, is just as wicked, and he looks pretty good." I agree. This is a actually a great example of a costume designer using personal color as a characterization tool to brilliant effect. Yes, Lucretia and Batiatus are both (mostly) wicked. Yes, they both plot and scheme. Yes, they're both insincere. The difference, and the reason Batiatus appears in his correct colors, is that he is sincerely insincere. He is a fearless, plotting, power-hungry schemer inside and out, and he revels in it. No weakness, no self-doubt. He's totally centered in himself. Lucretia, though, worries. She frets. She's not happy. She wants something more... it's not clear what. (A clue: just about the only time she looks halfway real is in a scene at the end of the season, when she's lying in bed, having just discovered she's pregnant. Hair's still wrong, but the ivory robe, soft light & natural makeup create a less artificial effect:) So in addition to the contrast between these crafty characters and the virtuous characters in the series, the narrative is enhanced by dramatic contrast between husband and wife. Batiatus is strong, centered and authentic; Lucretia is scattered and false. Their colors communicate this to us, probably without us realizing it. The characters, and the overall narrative, are made more complex and effective by a costume designer's understanding of personal color.
7 Comments
s
3/17/2011 03:51:24 am
I doubt she is Winter or Deep Autumn.
Reply
Rachel
3/17/2011 06:10:45 am
You may be right that she's a lighter season. :-)
Reply
s
3/18/2011 10:09:47 am
The photo you chose is from 2008 when she is dying her hair.
Reply
Rachel
3/18/2011 01:04:16 pm
s - Yes, she certainly was more fair-haired as a younger person. So many of us were - including some Deeps. I think she can take quite a bit of color, but she could certainly be one of several seasons. Maybe after I have my baby I'll spend a week or so deconstructing her, a la Aishwarya. :-)
Reply
Dorota
11/25/2024 12:09:59 pm
I've wondered many times over whether she's a bright winter or bright spring, but I think she might be the latter. That would also work with her natural, lighter hair, but I have to say, nothing equals to her dark hair in Xena. She just looks so radiant and bright and alive like that! She's also worn rather bright outfits in the past, and they bring out her eyes in the most beautiful way!
Reply
jkitten
11/8/2011 07:49:13 pm
How deep can a soft autumns colora really go? Alot of websites that explain soft autumn make me think they don't go all that deep. Im trying to figure out my colors. So far it seems the soft seasons are far to faded and or light for me. I think will continue also looking into true spring and true autumn
Reply
s
12/25/2011 09:53:36 am
I think people are being honest when they claim their hair was lighter as a child than it really was. Memories are not perfect, especially from childhood.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
About Me...I'm passionate about helping people become their most authentic and beautiful selves. Categories
All
|