Reveal your true beauty with personal color analysis (PCA) and personal style analysis.

Dress For Your Face, Not For Your Body

8/31/2016

This is a revolutionary new way of thinking about style.

All of the advice you've received, all of your life, has been about how to dress your body. "If you're petite, avoid long pants. If you're curvy, emphasize your waist. "

As far as I can tell, every other style system advises you to dress primarily for your body.

But your body isn't what people are mainly looking at.

They spend the vast majority of their time looking at your face.

And dressing for your body at the expense of your face means you end up looking all wrong.

Let me offer you several examples to demonstrate this phenomenon.

Here's Ellie Kemper:

You might know her from "The Office" or "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt." She's adorbs, right?

If you're guessing that she has a lot of Gamine and a lot of Ingenue (and maybe some Classic?), I'd agree with you. Those stripes are cute on her. (The palette is a separate issue, but never mind.)

Another pic of her looking fantastic:

The headband! The bangs! The cardigan! The tiny earrings! The Nancy Drew hair! So, so right for her. So much Gamine and Ingenue. (And maybe some Classic.)

Here, tiny ruffles, tiny necklace, yoke emphasis -- so Ingenue, and so good:

And here: adorable, face-framing curls, small geometric print, simple, round neckline, high waist -- again, lots of Gamine and Ingenue, very good:

Just a few more images of her looking awesome with lots of Gamine and Ingenue (and some Classic):

But let's imagine that Ellie Kemper's going to get style advice that considers her body as a significant factor.

I don't know if you noticed, but Kemper actually has a super-curvy, very Romantic body.:

Most style systems will assign Ellie Kemper a style type that dresses her for her curvy body.

But that would be all wrong.

See how uncomfortable, how not-herself, this Gamine Ingenue (or Classic-Gamine-Ingenue) looks in Romantic styles:

A plunging, cleavage-revealing neckline, which is great on so many women, looks inappropriate on Kemper.

In a drapy, clingy, figure-emphasizing dress, she looks lost, as if she's a little girl playing dress-up.

Again, this very draped neckline and slinky fabric is much too mature for her. It feels awkward.

Also too, too mature. The very detailed, plunging, bust-emphasizing neckline and sexy, cinched waist are completely at odds with her Gamine-Ingenue face.

Thank goodness Kemper (or her stylist) usually understand that she needs to dress for her face, not her body.

Here, Kemper's waist is obscured and her bust is unemphasized. And it's sooo much better!

(Jenna Fischer, also from "The Office," is another example of a woman with a Romantic body but a very youthful face. Like Kemper, Fischer looks all wrong in overtly sexy clothes.

By contrast, Mindy Kaling of "The Office" has quite a bit of Gamine, like Kemper and Fischer do -- but she also has enough sexy Romantic in her face to totally pull off figure-emphasizing clothes. )

"If you got it, flaunt it" is not a thing. Let it go.

Only emphasize your curvy body if it also harmonizes with your face.

Dress for your face.

Other celebrity examples of dressing primarily for one's face, not one's body:

Jane Krakowski of "30 Rock" and "Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt"

A rather Natural body (little waist, thicker neck, small bust).

A rather Ingenue face (tiny chin, high forehead, big eyes.)

Is she better in Ingenue or Natural?

Ingenue bows, ruffles, puff sleeves, cap sleeves, high waist, feminine hair, midi length skirt: so good.

Natural t-shirts, layers, separates, shaggy hair, undefined neckline, geometric shapes -- not great.

Jane Krakowski is lovelier when she dresses her face, not her body.

I'm not saying to totally disregard your body. There are individual tweaks your body may call for that are consistent with a style your face doesn't manifest.

For example, Jane Krakowski is flattered by open necklines; they elongate her rather short neck.

That's consistent with Natural, not with Ingenue.

But her open necklines are best when they're adorned with ruffles or bows. True Natural necklines are wrong for her.

Gwendoline Christie, a.k.a. Brienne of Tarth.

Sweet Ingenue/Ethereal (and Natural?) face,

extremely tall, mostly Dramatic body.

Christie is so tall -- 6'3" -- and relatively narrow, most style systems would require her to dress as a Dramatic, or a Dramatic/Natural blend.

But that's really wrong for her.

Mostly Dramatic, and so not great:

Much more feminine, and so much better for her:

Even more celebrity examples:

Despite her height, Taylor Swift is fantastic in Gamine , Ingenue and Classic
Despite his height, Leonardo DiCaprio can pull off dapper Gamine looks because of his Gamine baby face
Brigitte Nielsen's gorgeous Dramatic face makes her best in similarly Dramatic clothes, despite her very curvy body

The same goes for Jamie Lee Curtis: her Dramatic face makes sexy Romantic looks seem wrong for her , even though her curves are pronounced

To sum up:

1. Identify your style identity based primarily on your face.

2. Make a few tweaks in the direction of a different style identity if you know your body calls for it.

Dress for your face!

46 Comments

Beth

8/31/2016 03:49:42 pm

Thank you. As usual, you have as my Father would say, "hit the nail on the head." This means you are entirely right and now I think why I have been having so much trouble figuring out my "style identity.' I know that I have a slightly curvy/Romantic body which is also a rectangular/Natural shape. I can wear some Natural type clothes and feel comfortable. The Romantic clothes make me feel like a six year playing dress-up in her mother's old clothes. As for my face, it is, I think, is Gamine in shape; small, youthful, and round. I also have narrow, small Green eyes, full Ingenue lips, but my Nose is very Natural, average to large, almost "shapeless." I also wear glasses. No one, but my cat or I would usually see me without my glasses. I have worn them so long; they are a part of my face as are my eyes, lips, and nose. I think, other than my glasses, you would probably notice the shape of face, (round, small, very youthful) rather than my eyes or lips. My eyes hide behind my glasses. I have had many compliments on my smile, though. Like, I said, I think you are greatly correct. I, also, think that if you would add in your "special giftedness", you would really be able to dress who you are. But, at first, I do have a question, when dressing and choosing clothes and the face is in in question, how do you determine which attribute or attributes of the face do you "utilize" in deciding your "style identity?" Please forgive if my post is too long. Thank you.

Rachel

8/31/2016 04:14:57 pm

Hi! Thank you for the lovely words.

I think you can identify two or at most three primary essences in your face, and then dress for that two-essence or three-essence identity. You mentioned Natural, Gamine and Ingenue with regard to your face; if that's right for you, this might be your best look:

https://www.pinterest.com/coloranalysis/natural-gamine-ingenue/

Eleanna link

8/31/2016 04:27:22 pm

Well said! I adore how you correctly type Gwendoline Christie, she's so sweet, it is unfair everybody thinks she has to wear "tall woman" styles as if she were Dramatic. Her beauty is so fragile it completely gets lost!

Beverley

8/31/2016 05:08:38 pm

Brilliant post and explains why mistakes can be made so easily. Rachel's suggestion to have a photo of your face on hand when using her style tool is genius.

Kristy

8/31/2016 08:12:10 pm

I think you are spot on with this. I have one of those faces that people usually call striking rather than pretty - somewhere between dramatic, natural, and ethereal. Yet I am of average height with a curvy, rounded figure...and the absolute worst style on me is overtly sexy, romantic, or feminine! I am at my best in a kind of loose minimalist, artsy kind of look, one that emphasizes my uniqueness. I think I am dressing for my face already...

Mary Ellen

8/31/2016 11:03:04 pm

Wow, Rachel! You are way far ahead of all the image consultants out there. Obviously, we couldn't wear a waist cinching dress if we have a thick torso, but if our face reads romantic, it makes sense to go with that and find a way to gently feminize our bodies. Please write more about how to analyze our facial types.

As always, thanks for the great posts. Yours are the best!

Melissa

9/2/2016 05:59:31 pm

Let me just say AMEN to everything in this post! As a skinny 5'3" woman, I didn't understand why I always felt so ridiculous in Gamine/Ingenue clothes until I learned that my face was mostly Dramatic. Thank you for confirming what I was already realizing. This post is logical, well-organized, and convincing. I want to take it to the mall, put it on a big screen, and help people figure out their types so they stop buying clothes that feel wrong on them! It would have saved me a lot of confusion and money through the years if I'd known about this all along.

Eva

9/4/2016 12:16:32 pm

Thank you for this amazing post. I keep reading it over and over and find that it's really changing the way I think about dressing myself. I'm not sure what I am but hopefully will figure this out! Thanks again.

Sue

9/4/2016 06:50:21 pm

Your descriptions are really informative, but I am still perplexed about my category. I'm gamine in stature, but not pure gamine in face; yang eyes, large turned up nose, full lips, elongated oval face with the high forehead. My hair is curly and I look good in bob haircuts and when my hair is gathered in a loose bun. People usually comment that i look a lot younger. Here's the thing, I'm an inverted v (slim athletic) with a somewhat full chest (isn't this a natural). I look better in clean lined, fitted tops, not boxy shapes or a lot of drapey layers. Separates look good on me and I prefer solids or sparse patterns over busy patterns which seem to compete with my features. I'm drawn to modern minimalist styles, yet, I can't seem to find a category that fits.

anastasia

10/3/2017 11:47:16 am

that sounds like it could be a flamboyant natural.

Melissa

9/5/2016 01:58:33 am

Sue, Eva, and anyone else who still hasn't figured out their style type: I had Rachel analyze me, and it was worth so much more than what she's charging. For the cost of a couple of outfits, I learned specifically what worked for me and why it worked. It cleared up so many questions about why some outfits stayed buried in my closet and others were worn over and over. Since learning my type, I have saved myself many stressful, indecisive shopping trips (and returns). I spend less time getting dressed every morning and feel more confident in the outfit I ultimately end up in. It's a great feeling to know you're making the most of your looks, whatever style type you are.

Sue

9/5/2016 06:37:06 pm

I figured out that I'm a blend, hence all the contrasting and seemingly conflicting features. The blend that best appeals visually and works pretty well is the soft classic-natural-romantic. Even though I'm petite, the gamine features never quite resonated with me.

Fil

9/5/2016 08:44:39 pm

This is great, Rachel. I think you got it exactly right. So very insightful. Well done!

Melina

9/7/2016 07:51:20 am

This is very interesting, as until now I've thought one decides style identities based on body, first and foremost - that's also what these definitions http://www.truth-is-beauty.com/style-analysis.html seem to refer to; for example: "The Romantic style identity has womanly, sexy lines" - how are you to find "sexy lines" on the face, as that's not usually seen a sexy body part...? So that has confused me all along and put me off style identities; also as I do know what looks good on me and what doesn't, but no style identity is an exact match, not even a blend of two or three (although Romantic, Ingenue and Ethereal are the closest, I think.)

Melina

9/9/2016 04:28:21 am

Now that I've read more extensively about these style categories, this makes much more sense; for example, I have a mainly I/R face, with some E thrown in, but a mainly N/E body (I think), so I'd never be assigned to a R category in other systems, as I'm not that curvy, at least in the usual sense of "big-busted"... But R/I/E is the way I've been mostly dressing (nothing could look more wrong for me than N jeans and T-shirts!), and now I have confirmation it's actually the right style for me, if any was needed :)

ruby

9/7/2016 12:34:08 pm

This certainly rings true for me. Body-wise I am a DC albeit slightly tall. My face is probably much closer to FN, & my hair is definitely FN being thick & extremely coarse. What I have consistently found is that whilst the shapes of DC work well, & I always do better if I keep things simple, the overall vibe of the outfit needs to be closer to FN, so a lot more relaxed and rugged in feel than DC is usually seen as.

ruby

9/7/2016 02:01:40 pm

Also, Ellen Kemper reminds me a lot of a friend of mine who is totally R in the body but Gamine-Classic with a touch of Ingenue in the face. I could never imagine her showing cleavage, it would look quite bizarre and inappropriate!

Beth

9/10/2016 02:56:06 am

Like I said in a previous post, your observation about the high importance of the face in determining your "correct " style is an insight of "pure genius." I think the comments on this post bear this out. Most fashion stylists both on the internet and in books do not even think about. The face is usually only considered in the realm of choosing haircuts and glasses! But, I do have a few questions. First, could you please give a list of the facial characteristics of each style type. I really think that would clear up some questions and be very helpful. Also, I mentioned haircuts, since the hair is at the face, I was curious what role the hair plays in relation to the face in regards to determining the correct style type for a person. When, I say hair characteristics and its relation to style, I mean things like texture, wavy, curly, or straight, color, etc. Finally, I would like to add two things; the effect of "personality" in determining style type. I think, there might be a very strong relationship between the facial characteristics and personality characteristics. What do you think? Also, you mentioned I might be a natural/gamine/ingénue. After further study, I believe strongly I am just natural/ingénue which leads me to a thought. On the fragrance guide for this type, you mentioned several different ones. But, despite everything I keep returning to two that I have basically worn since college; L' Air du Temps and Avon's Sweet Honesty. It has come to the point that those are the only two I can really wear or maybe should wear. So many others give me such headaches I cannot bear it. And you are right about the "aquatics" and "citruses" in regards to the "natural/ingénue." Those are so far away from the personality, etc. of the "natural/ingénue." I still think you should write a book. I would purchase it. Thank you for your time and letting me say what is on my mind. Bless you. .

Dana

9/10/2016 09:40:26 am

Great post, and one of the best original insights I have seen on this topic! It opened up some more questions for me, though.
Appropriateness: how would a 65-year old of the Ellie Kemper type dress flatteringly, without looking silly? Does this change with age? What about an Ingenue or pure Romantic type, such as Salma Hayak, who needs to look professional or even intimidating? (Trial lawyer, corporate officer, etc)
Body movement/personality: Seems like this should be taken into account. I am thinking of particularly graceful persons, or someone just clunky and awkward. If one is an Ethereal face type, but moves and walks in a brusque or awkward manner, it seems like some accomodation would need to be made. I've known a few people of this type, where the abrupt body language was one of the first things one noticed about them.
Thanks Rachel for this fantastic post!

Rachel

12/7/2017 02:27:00 pm

Hi, Dana!

One of my favorite things is seeing older women killing it in Gamine and Ingenue styles. I think those older women whose faces still read as quite Gamine or Ingenue can pull off these very youthful looks pretty easily. This woman has an adorably childlike face, and I think she's totally pulling off the wacky glasses:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5a/dd/46/5add464b028035e1ba54775712305fe8.jpg

There are tons more examples out there. I will make a note to address this in a future blog post. :-)

Dee

9/10/2016 02:29:43 pm

Absolutely loved this. Made so much sense to me. Thanks for showing the bodies also. I am rather curvy, yet feel my face is far from R and I feel SO wrong in anything sexy or R. I thought 'I' was wrong... now this has made me realise perhaps my gut was right all along. Please write more like this and show more examples. Read this 3 times ;)

9/16/2016 04:00:09 pm

Gwendoline Christie does not look great in ingenue clothes ( despite the fact she has ingenue face). Isn't it dramatic-natural what makes her look good?

Rachel

9/16/2016 04:02:59 pm

Hi!
I don't think pure Ingenue would be great on her, but I find some Ingenue elements adorable for her. I don't think Dramatic Natural does her any favors. But maybe you can link some pics where she looks fantastic in those DN lines and shapes?

9/16/2016 04:16:20 pm

Rachel, I meant those clothes that are shown here as an example when she looks great. I thought these are natural-dramatic, or natural-ethereal, "feminine". It interested me because I see myself here. Huge eyes, full mouth, narrow face. I'm not tall but ethereal. Ingenue, gamine and classic looks awful on me.

Alli

9/21/2016 08:17:13 am

Hi,

I was wondering if you had any ideas as to what Ellie Kemper's season would be?

ruby

9/21/2016 04:58:46 pm

TA maybe? Or TSp? I said TA because she seemed to look good in the burgundy.

Melina

9/22/2016 03:02:28 am

Hmm, to me she looks too good in the white top to be either... I'd say she looks very much a Soft, or possibly Light (?) season. It's intriguing to (try to) analyze, anyway :)

Rachel

9/28/2016 12:38:47 pm

I've thought a lot about this, because I've seen The Office all the way through like 6 times. :-) I'm about 90% sure she's a Spring. True Spring is my first guess. :-)

Kathryn

9/27/2016 05:54:17 pm

Amazing insight! I remember two ladies with very different faces and nearly identical bodies who did this very experiment. They, too, concluded that they are really dressing for their faces. Even the great John Kitchener (I believe it was he) said that the face plays something like 50% of the style analysis. Thanks so much for sharing this aha! insight.

Rachael

10/10/2016 04:41:34 pm

So agree with this. Like many seem to be here my body is a lot more yin than my face, which has super prominent cheekbones, narrow yet squared off nose, straighter brows, blunt chin. I think about my body when choosing silhouettes/scale and then my face/personality when choosing the actual content of the style like the details, prints, textures etc. I love emphasizing my very dramatic waist and hips with the silhouette but then using more yang type elements when it comes to the styling (love super chunky 80s jewelry, loud lipstick as well as effortless t-shirts and jeans and other basics), I feel that perfect balance of sexy and true to myself when I dress that way.

Wampierz

10/15/2016 11:30:11 am

Definitely some interesting observation. But I thought the face always must be the same type as the body? Or not? Style analysis was never easy to me.

I wonder if it is not that maybe the ideas of what the type's body looks like are bit too rigid, as it's usually harder to catch than in the face?

Anyway, when it comes to Brigitte Nielsen, I don't think she was ever a person who you could describe as 'curvy', and certainly not very curvy.

I'm not 100% sure, but it looks she got breast implants some time into her career. But even if she naturally grew bigger bust at some point, it was literally the only curvy thing about her figure. Her whole silhouette was always very slender, elongated and toned. It always caught my attention how narrow her hips are. She had also slender tights and generally very slender limbs. She also never had actually accentuated waist, it just didn't attract attention, because she was so slender. I thought that would mean Dramatic or Dramatic/Natural or something like that.

Here are some old photos where her bust is either natural or simply just not accentuated:
http://t.imgbox.com/iwDSyp1i.jpg
http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NTAwWDMxNw==/$T2eC16R,!)EE9s2ugOz)BQdL!C58bQ~~60_35.jpg

Wampierz

10/15/2016 04:07:03 pm

As for Gwendoline Christie, to me it seems she looks amazing in all things you call Ethereal. Not only the clothes, but more floing hair with that S-curve you described is better than smaller, ingenue curls.

There is defenitely some youthful quality in her face, and in right outfits, if they show legs, she evokes an impression of some cute young but large animal, like a calf. Maybe it's more of Gamine than Ingenue?

Beth

10/15/2016 04:36:48 pm

I think this is where I have my real problem; what actually is the difference between the gamine face and the ingénue face. Also, between the gamine body and the ingénue body. As a teenager and through early adulthood, I think my body was probably a gamine/ingénue type mix. Then, as I grew a little more in life experience, my body became a little more romantic, at least in the upper portion. However, in addition the Dramatic style, I have never really felt comfortable as a Romantic style. I would never feel comfortable dressing like a Marilyn Monroe or Elizabeth Taylor! Even today, I think I do dress, maybe like a gamine/ingénue mix of types. In college, my friends called me the "all-American girl." But, I am too "short" to be a natural and I shun all makeup due to sensitivities and allergies, except for nail polish. I have a passion for light pink nail polish. Sometimes when I read on the internet, the gamine sounds like the ingénue and vice versa. I think I like my gamine side, but, I don't want to be a "Boy." One of my favorite actresses is Audrey Hepburn, the gamine of all gamines. Finally, have you ever studied how the Myers Briggs types are reflected in your 63 types. They say that each of the sixteen types dress a little differently and reflective of one's Myer Briggs type. Thank you very much. Have a great day!

Amy

11/3/2016 04:29:03 am

I needed to hear this. Or rather, read this. Youthful face that gets described as cute, but tall, curvy, and broad at the same time. Neither soft dramatic or soft natural worked. Going to consider ingenue blends now!

Julie

11/6/2016 08:23:48 am

So this has done a lot to help me but I'm still confused. You see, I've been treating myself as a FG but my face is VERY dramatic. My eyes are small and almond shaped, my facial contours are sleek, long and angular. Only my mouth is FG. Likewise my sister is very FN in her face. But we are both petite with very gamine bodies.

I find certain Gamine things are too 'cute' for me (especially near my face) and before I discovered kibbe I was drawn to monochrome ensembles but I can see in photos that an unbroken line doesn't flatter my height. At the same time, I look great with short hair (it's very curly so I keep it short).

So I'm still not sure where to go from here..,

Rachel

11/6/2016 10:56:39 am

Hi, Julie!
My first thought is that you should concentrate on Dramatic particularly in your hair, makeup, and ensemble from the waist up, and manifest Gamine in your vertical line (by breaking it up) and in your hem and cuff lengths (by keeping them cropped).

Sue

11/19/2016 09:12:06 am

That's how I incorporate the gamine part of my physique, I look better in broken lines. The top part, for me, is better suited to a natural classic clean lined blend with a touch of romantic in he drape or pattern.

Anat link

1/3/2017 08:38:43 pm

Hi Julie! I'm somewhat obsessed with your website and your pinterest boards - very informative, comprehensive and fun! I have been into color seasons and Kibbe (and others) for a while, and your style identity calculator, alongside your posts, made me realize I'm some mix of Natural and Classic. Kibbe never seemed to fully "fit" for me maybe because there isn't a place in his system that matches the Classic quality with a yang quality that is Natural and not Dramatic. Did you encounter a similar problem with other clients-readers? Maybe one of the readers can identify? I ask because I do want to try and draw from Kibbe - who seems genuinely helpful once you crack your type, but I can't seem to get around the fact that I'm to tall for SC (5'8''), to balanced for SN and too soft for DC...

Anat

1/3/2017 08:40:12 pm

I wrote the wrong name after posting a similar question in a forum! How embarrassing :(

Katelyn

2/5/2017 06:41:19 pm

Hi! This is great and so helpful! I'm wondering if you have broken down Jenna Fischer's style type blend? You mention her here as a youthful face and romantic body...wondering if you mostly see gamine/romantic or something else? Would love to know!

Lauren

2/22/2017 11:47:19 pm

This is awesome. Thank you!!!

Ruth

3/1/2017 03:54:08 pm

Thanks for posting this! My face is on the dramatic (yang) side, while my body is curvy. In spite of my body, I have never been able to pull off Romantic looks. I appreciate knowing that someone else thinks the way I do - dress for your face first. I feel relieved.

Suy

2/14/2018 02:45:08 pm

This is great would love to see examples of black celebrities like Beyonce or rihanna or michelle Obama

Kath

2/22/2018 05:32:55 pm

I'm honestly obsessed with this website, it's so insightful and interesting. I feel like I can type others well but not myself. If anyone could help, I'd be interested in hearing what others would type me as.

My body is probably gamine. I'm short and thin, my figure is pear shaped but even then I'm described as slender. I have elongated limbs, "elegant" hands, a long and thin neck. I've had several people not realise how short I was, especially from looking at photos of me. I dress in "natural" because gamine or ingenue styles (my guesses for myself) don't suit me/feels wrong.

My face confuses me the most. It's small but oval, I would say ingenue or gamine, but I've been described as striking which is more of a dramatic characteristic, but I'm not. My brows are thick and full, my lips are full, my nose is upturned, like a button nose. I have prominent cheeks and "cat like" eyes according to people. It sounds dramatic but it all blends together in a way that my features aren't harsh. I look young so maybe ingenue? I've also been told I look like Grace Kelly, which is dumb because I'm not white, maybe they meant I'm a "classic" but it doesn't seem right.

If somebody could help guess, I'd appreciate it. Sorry for the wall of text, I'm stumped

saucyminx

3/7/2018 05:16:46 pm

How can you tell which kibbe type your face is?

Rachel

3/14/2018 03:37:28 pm

Hi, Saucy. This isn't easy to teach, but I can give you some general help:

- Positioning yourself on the masculine-feminine spectrum can help rule out or zero in on certain essences. If you could pass as a boy in the right clothes, you might have a lot of Gamine; if you could do drag convincingly, like Glenn Close or Julie Andrews, you might have a lot of Natural or Dramatic; and if you could never do either in a million years, you have probably don't have much of those three essences.

- If your overall look is rather childlike, that can signal a lot of Gamine or Ingenue; if you've always looked like a little adult, even as a child, that can signal Dramatic or Ethereal (or sometimes Natural).

- If your face is impossible to caricature, that's a hint that you have a lot of Classic.

- If you can't do shaggy or tousled hair, you can probably rule out Natural. If you can't do big, luscious curls, you can probably rule out Romantic (and perhaps Ingenue). If you can't do super-long hair, you may be able to rule out Ethereal, Natural, and Dramatic. If you can't do super-short hair, you can probably rule out Gamine and Dramatic.

A lot of people have found the Style Identity Calculator helpful...

https://www.truth-is-beauty.com/store/p82/Style_ID_Calculator.html

Dress For Your Face, Not For Your Body

Leave a Reply.

About Me...

Categories

Archives